Skip to content
AirPermitHub
Air Permitting

Writing a synthetic minor limit that holds up

What EPA guidance says an enforceable limit on potential to emit has to contain, how to choose the averaging period and the parameter you limit, and the records that keep a synthetic minor source minor.

10 min readPublished 2026-10-31

What the limit has to do

A synthetic minor source could emit above a major source threshold at full design capacity, and takes limits that keep its potential to emit below it. The limit works only if it changes potential to emit, and it changes potential to emit only if it can be enforced.

The definition starts from design capacity. Anything that brings the number down, whether an hours cap, a throughput cap, or a control device, counts only when it is written into an enforceable requirement. Read the definition in the program you are applying under; the PSD definition is at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(4) and the Title V definition at 40 CFR 70.2.

What the text says
  • “Potential to emit means the maximum capacity of a stationary source to emit any air pollutant under its physical and operational design.”
    40 CFR 70.2

The two tests in EPA's guidance

EPA's 1989 guidance on limiting potential to emit in new source permitting gives two criteria. The first is about the legal vehicle: the permit or plan the limit sits in. The second, enforceable as a practical matter, is about the wording: whether someone outside the facility can tell from the permit and the records whether the source complied.

The second test is where drafting matters. A limit can sit in a valid permit and still fail it, for example an annual emission cap with no stated way to calculate emissions.

What the text says
  • “1) it is federally enforceable as defined by 40 C.F.R. Sections 52.21(b) (17), 51.165(a) (1) (xiv), 51.166(b) (17), i.e., contained in a permit issued pursuant to an EPA-approved permitting program or a permit directly issued by EPA, or has been submitted to EPA as a revision to a State Implementation Plan and approved as such by EPA; and 2) it is enforceable as a practical matter.”
    EPA, Guidance on Limiting Potential to Emit in New Source Permitting (June 13, 1989)

Three things each condition must say

EPA's 1995 memo on options for limiting potential to emit lists what a source-specific permit has to specify. Use it as a drafting checklist for each limit:

  • What is limited, stated precisely, and which units or parts of the source it covers
  • The time period the limit applies over
  • How compliance is determined: the monitoring, the calculation, the records, and the reports
What the text says

Choose the averaging period on purpose

A long averaging period gives operations room, but it also lets a source run at full capacity for part of the period. EPA guidance prefers short-term limits and allows rolling limits where the permitting authority accepts that compliance can be readily determined. Look at what your agency has accepted for similar sources, and raise it early if you need a longer period.

A rolling limit is checked every period, not once a year. The Rolling 12-Month Limit Tracker sets up the monthly check and shows next month's headroom.

What the text says, word for word

Limit something you can measure

Few minor sources measure emissions directly. The usual approach limits an operating parameter that drives emissions, such as fuel burned, throughput, or hours, and ties it to emissions with a stated factor or equation. Each limit should stand on its own: if the permit caps both throughput and hours, each is a separate condition that can be checked.

Keep the emission factor behind the limit in the permit record, with its source document and revision, so the basis stays clear if the factor is later revised.

What the text says, word for word

When a control device does the work

If the limit relies on a control device, its efficiency alone is not enough. The permit needs the operating conditions the efficiency depends on, such as a minimum operating temperature, a pilot flame, or a closed vent system that stays closed, with monitoring of each.

Claim only the efficiency you can support: a performance test, a value the applicable rule allows, or a manufacturer guarantee the agency accepts.

What the text says

Records that keep the source minor

The records are the proof. Plan them with the limit: what is metered or logged and how often, who calculates the total and when, where the factor comes from, and how long records are kept. A month without records is a month the source can't show it complied.

Date each calculation, and keep the original when a month is corrected, so the file shows both.

What the text says

Some federal rules set their own list

A few rules say what a limit must contain before it can lower potential emissions for that rule's applicability. NSPS Subpart OOOOb does this for tank batteries. If a limit is meant to keep equipment out of a rule like this, check it against that rule's list as well as the general guidance.

What the text says, word for word
  • “Beginning January 22, 2027, or upon startup, whichever is later, for purposes of determining the applicability of a storage vessel tank battery as an affected facility, a legally and practicably enforceable limit must include the elements provided in paragraphs (e)(2)(i)(A) through (F) of this section.”
    40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)
  • “A quantitative production limit and quantitative operational limit(s) for the equipment, or quantitative operational limits for the equipment;”
    40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(A)
  • “An averaging time period for the production limit in (e)(2)(i)(A) of this section, if a production-based limit is used, that is equal to or less than 30 days;”
    40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(B)
  • “Established parametric limits for the production and/or operational limit(s) in paragraph (e)(2)(i)(A) of this section, and where a control device is used to achieve an operational limit, an initial compliance demonstration (i.e., performance test) for the control device that establishes the parametric limits;”
    40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(C)
  • “Ongoing monitoring of the parametric limits in (e)(2)(i)(C) of this section that demonstrates continuous compliance with the production and/or operational limit(s) in (e)(2)(i)(A) of this section;”
    40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(D)
  • “Recordkeeping by the owner or operator that demonstrates continuous compliance with the limit(s) in (e)(2)(i)(A) through (D) of this section; and”
    40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(E)
  • “Periodic reporting that demonstrates continuous compliance.”
    40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(F)

Before you submit

Check the draft conditions against this list:

  • Potential to emit without the limit is calculated first, so the limit's effect is visible
  • Each limit names the units it covers, the limited quantity, and the averaging period
  • The calculation from the monitored parameter to emissions is written out, with the factor's source
  • Monitoring, records, and reports are specific enough for an inspector to check
  • Control device conditions match the basis of the claimed efficiency
  • Any rule-specific list, such as OOOOb's for tank batteries, is met
  • Operations knows the limit and gets a monthly budget against it

Sources

This guide explains how programs fit together. Thresholds, limits, and dates appear only in the quoted text, linked to its source; read the full provision before relying on it.

AirPermitHub provides educational, engineering, research, and compliance-support information. Information provided by the platform does not constitute legal advice and should not replace review of applicable regulations, permits, agency guidance, or consultation with qualified professionals. Full disclaimer