What the limit has to do
A synthetic minor source could emit above a major source threshold at full design capacity, and takes limits that keep its potential to emit below it. The limit works only if it changes potential to emit, and it changes potential to emit only if it can be enforced.
The definition starts from design capacity. Anything that brings the number down, whether an hours cap, a throughput cap, or a control device, counts only when it is written into an enforceable requirement. Read the definition in the program you are applying under; the PSD definition is at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(4) and the Title V definition at 40 CFR 70.2.
“Potential to emit means the maximum capacity of a stationary source to emit any air pollutant under its physical and operational design.”
40 CFR 70.2
The two tests in EPA's guidance
EPA's 1989 guidance on limiting potential to emit in new source permitting gives two criteria. The first is about the legal vehicle: the permit or plan the limit sits in. The second, enforceable as a practical matter, is about the wording: whether someone outside the facility can tell from the permit and the records whether the source complied.
The second test is where drafting matters. A limit can sit in a valid permit and still fail it, for example an annual emission cap with no stated way to calculate emissions.
“1) it is federally enforceable as defined by 40 C.F.R. Sections 52.21(b) (17), 51.165(a) (1) (xiv), 51.166(b) (17), i.e., contained in a permit issued pursuant to an EPA-approved permitting program or a permit directly issued by EPA, or has been submitted to EPA as a revision to a State Implementation Plan and approved as such by EPA; and 2) it is enforceable as a practical matter.”
EPA, Guidance on Limiting Potential to Emit in New Source Permitting (June 13, 1989)
Three things each condition must say
EPA's 1995 memo on options for limiting potential to emit lists what a source-specific permit has to specify. Use it as a drafting checklist for each limit:
- What is limited, stated precisely, and which units or parts of the source it covers
- The time period the limit applies over
- How compliance is determined: the monitoring, the calculation, the records, and the reports
“enforceability for a source-specific permit means that the permit's provisions must specify: (1) A technically-accurate limitation and the portions of the source subject to the limitation; (2) the time period for the limitation (hourly, daily, monthly, and annual limits such as rolling annual limits); and (3) the method to determine compliance including appropriate monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting.”
EPA, Options for Limiting the Potential to Emit (PTE) of a Stationary Source Under Section 112 and Title V (January 25, 1995)
Choose the averaging period on purpose
A long averaging period gives operations room, but it also lets a source run at full capacity for part of the period. EPA guidance prefers short-term limits and allows rolling limits where the permitting authority accepts that compliance can be readily determined. Look at what your agency has accepted for similar sources, and raise it early if you need a longer period.
A rolling limit is checked every period, not once a year. The Rolling 12-Month Limit Tracker sets up the monthly check and shows next month's headroom.
“the time over which they extend should be as short term as possible and should generally not exceed one month.”
EPA, Guidance on Limiting Potential to Emit in New Source Permitting (June 13, 1989)“However, the limit should not exceed an annual limit rolled on a monthly basis.”
EPA, Guidance on Limiting Potential to Emit in New Source Permitting (June 13, 1989)“EPA policy expresses a preference toward short term limits, generally daily but not to exceed one month. However, EPA policy allows for rolling limits not to exceed 12 months or 365 days where the permitting authority finds that the limit provides an assurance that compliance can be readily determined and verified.”
EPA, Options for Limiting the Potential to Emit (PTE) of a Stationary Source Under Section 112 and Title V (January 25, 1995)
Limit something you can measure
Few minor sources measure emissions directly. The usual approach limits an operating parameter that drives emissions, such as fuel burned, throughput, or hours, and ties it to emissions with a stated factor or equation. Each limit should stand on its own: if the permit caps both throughput and hours, each is a separate condition that can be checked.
Keep the emission factor behind the limit in the permit record, with its source document and revision, so the basis stays clear if the factor is later revised.
“Where monitoring cannot be used to determine emissions directly, limits on appropriate operating parameters must be established for the units or source, and monitoring must verify compliance with those limits.”
EPA, Options for Limiting the Potential to Emit (PTE) of a Stationary Source Under Section 112 and Title V (January 25, 1995)“Production and operational limits must be stated as conditions that can be enforced independently of one another.”
EPA, Guidance on Limiting Potential to Emit in New Source Permitting (June 13, 1989)
When a control device does the work
If the limit relies on a control device, its efficiency alone is not enough. The permit needs the operating conditions the efficiency depends on, such as a minimum operating temperature, a pilot flame, or a closed vent system that stays closed, with monitoring of each.
Claim only the efficiency you can support: a performance test, a value the applicable rule allows, or a manufacturer guarantee the agency accepts.
“permit writers should include, so that the operating efficiency condition is enforceable as a practical matter, those operating parameters and assumptions which the permitting agency depended upon to determine that the control equipment would have a given efficiency.”
EPA, Guidance on Limiting Potential to Emit in New Source Permitting (June 13, 1989)
Records that keep the source minor
The records are the proof. Plan them with the limit: what is metered or logged and how often, who calculates the total and when, where the factor comes from, and how long records are kept. A month without records is a month the source can't show it complied.
Date each calculation, and keep the original when a month is corrected, so the file shows both.
“When permits contain production or operational limits, they should also have recordkeeping requirements that allow a permitting agency to verify a source's compliance with its limits.”
EPA, Guidance on Limiting Potential to Emit in New Source Permitting (June 13, 1989)
Some federal rules set their own list
A few rules say what a limit must contain before it can lower potential emissions for that rule's applicability. NSPS Subpart OOOOb does this for tank batteries. If a limit is meant to keep equipment out of a rule like this, check it against that rule's list as well as the general guidance.
“Beginning January 22, 2027, or upon startup, whichever is later, for purposes of determining the applicability of a storage vessel tank battery as an affected facility, a legally and practicably enforceable limit must include the elements provided in paragraphs (e)(2)(i)(A) through (F) of this section.”
40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)“A quantitative production limit and quantitative operational limit(s) for the equipment, or quantitative operational limits for the equipment;”
40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(A)“An averaging time period for the production limit in (e)(2)(i)(A) of this section, if a production-based limit is used, that is equal to or less than 30 days;”
40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(B)“Established parametric limits for the production and/or operational limit(s) in paragraph (e)(2)(i)(A) of this section, and where a control device is used to achieve an operational limit, an initial compliance demonstration (i.e., performance test) for the control device that establishes the parametric limits;”
40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(C)“Ongoing monitoring of the parametric limits in (e)(2)(i)(C) of this section that demonstrates continuous compliance with the production and/or operational limit(s) in (e)(2)(i)(A) of this section;”
40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(D)“Recordkeeping by the owner or operator that demonstrates continuous compliance with the limit(s) in (e)(2)(i)(A) through (D) of this section; and”
40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(E)“Periodic reporting that demonstrates continuous compliance.”
40 CFR 60.5365b(e)(2)(i)(F)
Before you submit
Check the draft conditions against this list:
- Potential to emit without the limit is calculated first, so the limit's effect is visible
- Each limit names the units it covers, the limited quantity, and the averaging period
- The calculation from the monitored parameter to emissions is written out, with the factor's source
- Monitoring, records, and reports are specific enough for an inspector to check
- Control device conditions match the basis of the claimed efficiency
- Any rule-specific list, such as OOOOb's for tank batteries, is met
- Operations knows the limit and gets a monthly budget against it
Sources
- EPA, Guidance on Limiting Potential to Emit in New Source Permitting (June 13, 1989)
- EPA, Options for Limiting the Potential to Emit (PTE) of a Stationary Source Under Section 112 and Title V (January 25, 1995)
- 40 CFR 70.2: definitions, including potential to emit (eCFR)
- 40 CFR 52.21(b)(4): potential to emit (eCFR)
- 40 CFR 60.5365b: OOOOb applicability, including tank battery limits (eCFR)
This guide explains how programs fit together. Thresholds, limits, and dates appear only in the quoted text, linked to its source; read the full provision before relying on it.
AirPermitHub provides educational, engineering, research, and compliance-support information. Information provided by the platform does not constitute legal advice and should not replace review of applicable regulations, permits, agency guidance, or consultation with qualified professionals. Full disclaimer
